Sports, legal, and communication commentators debated Lance Armstrong's “strategy” and motives this week for telling his story to Oprah Winfrey in her two-part “no holds barred” interview for which she prepared 112 questions.
Now comes this question: will his performance do Armstrong any good, or restore any of his credibility? Or will it just do him more harm, particularly from a legal standpoint? In the first five minutes of the interview, he admitted to Oprah that he doped and lied. For ...